Chess rating list – anchored on Rebel 6 UCI and Fritz BnB – Pentium 90

TOP 20:

      
   # PLAYER                           : RATING  ERROR   POINTS  PLAYED    (%)
   1 Stockfish 17                     :   3665     28   3629.5    5710   63.6%
   2 Berserk 13                       :   3589     29   1915.5    3800   50.4%
   3 Obsidian 13                      :   3588     29    841.5    1888   44.6%
   4 PlentyChess 2.1.0                :   3579     29   2009.0    3790   53.0%
   5 Alexandria 7.0.0                 :   3557     28   1721.5    3420   50.3%
   6 Caissa 1.20                      :   3555     28   1710.5    3417   50.1%
   7 Clover 8.0.2                     :   3537     29   1622.5    3420   47.4%
   8 RubiChess 20240112               :   3526     28   1584.0    3789   41.8%
   9 Seer 2.8.0                       :   3509     33    114.5     380   30.1%
  10 Koivisto 9.0                     :   3499     26   1673.5    3420   48.9%
  11 Rebel 16.3                       :   3485     30    209.0     770   27.1%
  12 Slowchess 2.8                    :   3426     37    219.0     340   64.4%
  13 Minic 3.30                       :   3316     27    659.0    1412   46.7%
  14 Black Marlin 7                   :   3281     27    681.0    1792   38.0%
  15 Arasan 23.3 NNUE                 :   3281     35    129.5     340   38.1%
  16 Fire 8.1                         :   3281     29    321.5     612   52.5%
  17 Pedone 3.1                       :   3277     26    591.5     952   62.1%
  18 Igel 3.05                        :   3276     25    798.0    1496   53.3%
  19 Komodo 14                        :   3272     27   1137.0    5320   21.4%
  20 Ethereal 13 classic              :   3260     31    249.0     408   61.0%

Update: Added Stockfish 17, Obsidian 13, Caissa 1.20, Clover 8.0.2, PlentyChess 2.1.0 and Alexandria 7.0.0.

Click here to download the complete rating list:

ratinglist.txt

The rating list is updated to 15/09/2024, it is calculated with Ordo and it is based on the following assumptions.

  • The Elo score of Rebel 6 UCI version is fixed at 2470, therefore it acts as an “anchor” for all the other engines. I calculated this score as the average between results obtained by the engine againsts humans players in the ’90, with the sources I was able to recover in Internet (Talkchess.com, Rebel14.nl, forums…).
  • Besides Rebel 6, Fritz Brains in Bahrain is also used, at a speed of 3500 kN/s, with its rating fixed at 2800 elo.
  • Time for each match has been fixed to 40 moves/120 minutes repeated, calibrated on a Pentium 90 processing power. The processing power has been emulated, after estimation by using benchmarks with real P90 results. Accordingly, on modern PC the effective match time was fixed to 40 moves/125” or 40/130” depending on the PC used for the test, with expected results similar to blitz matches. For some chess engines, such as for example Chess Titans, it was not possible to define the same match time; for this reason, I have shown for this engine, the characteristic of the PC used.
  • The opening suite consists of 190 positions, which are repeated for each engine (each engine plays each opening one as white, and one as black). For older engines, which do not uses standard UCI of XBoard interfaced (such as Battlechess for example), I’ve reproduced by hand the moves as indicated by the programs. The time for this engines has been calibrated on the processing power of a Pentium 90 as well. For all this reasons, the number of match of these engines are few, and based on random selection of the 34 opening positions. The opening suite is downloadable here.
  • All the tested chess engines are freely downloadable from Intenet, except for the programs I’ve bought myself years ago, and are all limited to 1 core.
  • Only the best version of Stockfish is shown in the “Top 10”, I’ve removed all derivatives (such as Shashchess for example). In the full rating list I’ve included them all (past SF versions, derivatives, clones…).
  • The main goal of this rating list, made for my exclusive enjoyment, was to estimate the level of play of modern engines, with respect to the older ones, but also to evaluate the actual playing strenght of many engines I loved in my youth (the already cited Battleches, for example).

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *